This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio P65 (MT6768) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Snapdragon 662 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. Everywhere Enhancements for Great Gaming. The MediaTek Helio P65 brings a new wave of. The smartphone is powered by the MediaTek Helio P65 processor paired with 8GB of RAM. It comes with 128GB of internal storage, and supports expandable storage up to 1TB via a microSD card.
- Released 2020, April 27
185g, 8.6mm thickness
Android 10, One UI 2.5
64GB/128GB storage, microSDXC - 16%4,278,327 hits
- 6.4'
1080x2400 pixels
- 48MP
- 4-8GB RAM
Helio P65
- 5000mAh
Versions: SM-A315F/DS (International); SM-A315G/DS (Asia, Australia)
Network | Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
---|
2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - SM-A315F |
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - SM-A315G |
4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - SM-A315F |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - SM-A315G |
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A |
Launch | Announced | 2020, March 24 |
---|
Status | Available. Released 2020, April 27 |
Body | Dimensions | 159.3 x 73.1 x 8.6 mm (6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 in) |
---|
Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
SIM | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
Display | Type | Super AMOLED |
---|
Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
Platform | OS | Android 10, One UI 2.5 |
---|
Chipset | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 (12nm) |
CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) |
GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 |
Memory | Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
---|
Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
eMMC 5.1 |
Main Camera | Quad | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0', 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0', 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) 5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
---|
Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
Video | 1080p@30fps |
Selfie camera | Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
---|
Video | 1080p@30fps |
Sound | Loudspeaker | Yes |
---|
3.5mm jack | Yes |
Comms | WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
---|
Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) |
Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go |
Helio P65
Features | Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
---|
Battery | Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
---|
Charging | Fast charging 15W |
Misc | Colors | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Red, Prism Crush White |
---|
Models | SM-A315F, SM-A315F/DS, SM-A315G/DS, SM-A315G, SM-A315N |
SAR EU | 0.49 W/kg (head) 1.68 W/kg (body) |
Price | € 213.90 / $ 197.98 / £ 191.99 / ₹ 17,999 |
Tests | Performance | AnTuTu: 151815 (v8) GeekBench: 5096 (v4.4), 1216 (v5.1) GFXBench: 7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
---|
Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Camera | Photo / Video |
Loudspeaker | -30.9 LUFS (Below average) |
Battery life |
Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more
Pricing
These are the best offers from our affiliate partners. We may get a commission from qualifying sales.
64GB 4GB RAM | € 222.00 | £ 191.99 |
128GB 4GB RAM | € 213.90 | £ 193.00 |
128GB 6GB RAM | £ 215.00 | £ 235.85 |
Similarly priced
Popular recent phones in the same price range as Samsung Galaxy A31
Samsung Galaxy A31 - user opinions and reviews
not good working A31
that's true
may I ask whether it freezes bcoz it is not responsive or because of it need some time to render the picture
ADVERTISEMENTS
VS
We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio P65 (with Arm Mali-G52 2EEMC2 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 810 (Mali-G52 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
Single and multi-core processor tests
29
48
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
14
32
Efficiency of battery consumption
54
74
Overall chip score
33
51
Main differences and advantages of each chip
- Performs 9.8x better in floating-point computations
- Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 12 nm)
- Shows significantly better (up to 74%) AnTuTu 8 score – 321K vs 184K
- 10% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2000 MHz)
Helio P65 Vs Snapdragon 665
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksThe AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
184808
321270
CPU | 64553 | 103259 |
GPU | 29759 | 85059 |
Memory | 31973 | 69725 |
UX | 34654 | 58333 |
Total score | 184808 | 321270 |
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
347
610
1274
2039
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile | - | 30 FPS [High] |
Call of Duty: Mobile | - | 41 FPS [Ultra] |
Fortnite | - | 29 FPS [Medium] |
Shadowgun Legends | - | 43 FPS [Ultra] |
World of Tanks Blitz | - | 59 FPS [Ultra] |
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | - | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
Device | - | Huawei Honor 9X 1080 x 2340 |
Helio P65 Vs Sd665
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Helio P65 and Kirin 810Architecture | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
L1 cache | - | 256 KB |
L2 cache | - | 1 MB |
Process | 12 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
Transistor count | 5.5 billion | 6.9 billion |
TDP | - | 5 W |
GPU name | Arm Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-G52 MP6 |
Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 820 MHz | 820 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 6 |
Shading units | 32 | 96 |
FLOPS | 56.4 Gigaflops | 551 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.1 |
OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 13.41 Gbit/s | - |
Max size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Neural processor (NPU) | NeuroPilot | Yes |
Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP |
Video capture | 1K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
Video playback | 1080p at 30FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265 |
Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 12 |
5G support | No | No |
Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
Upload speed | Up to 100 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 | 6 |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Announced | June 2019 | June 2019 |
Class | Mid range | Mid range |
Official page | MediaTek Helio P65 official site | - |
So, which SoC would you choose?
6 (15.8%)
32 (84.2%)
Total votes: 38
2.Exynos 9611 or Helio P65
4.Snapdragon 665 or Helio P65
6.Snapdragon 675 or Kirin 810
8.Kirin 970 or Kirin 810
Helio P65 Vs Snapdragon 660
10.Snapdragon 660 or Kirin 810